Peripheral Revision

Unfiltering history as we live it

Posts Tagged ‘libya imperialism

Rebels say Qatar ready to market east Libyan oil

leave a comment »

Alexander Dziadosz, Reuters, March 27, 2011

A senior Libyan rebel official said on Sunday Gulf oil producer Qatar had agreed to market crude oil produced from east Libyan fields which are no longer in the control of Muammar Gaddafi.

“We contacted the oil company of Qatar and thankfully they agreed to take all the oil that we wish to export and market this oil for us,” said Ali Tarhouni, a rebel official in charge of economic, financial and oil matters.

“Our next shipment will be in less than a week,” Tarhouni told reporters in the rebel-held eastern city of Benghazi.

State-owned Qatar Petroleum said it had no comment.

Small, energy-rich Qatar became the first Arab nation to begin patrolling a U.N. backed no-fly zone on Friday and has urged Gaddafi to quit to avoid more bloodshed.

Read the rest of this entry »


Written by peripheralrevision

03/27/2011 at 1:02 pm

Western “victory” depends on fueling Libya violence by arming rebels

leave a comment »

+It is suspected that Saudi Arabia and Egypt are already funneling arms to the Libyan rebels -PR+

Military operation could embolden rebels, US says

WESTERN air strikes on Libya could fuel a mutiny inside Muammar Gaddafi’s regime and bolster the ranks of opposition forces, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates said today.

The Australian, March 24, 2011

US officials believe the best hope to an early end to the Libya campaign is a popular uprising

…Speaking to reporters in the Egyptian capital as coalition forces enforced a UN no-fly zone in neighbouring Libya, Gates made no promises of an early end to the conflict and said that it was unrealistic to expect military action to be over in a matter of weeks.

He also acknowledged that it was difficult to gauge the strength of opposition forces, but held out the possibility that air raids could bring back volunteers to the rebels’ cause by stifling the regime’s firepower.

Read full article here

Libya: arming rebellion ‘would turn tide’

The Libyan rebel movement could legally be supplied with weapons from abroad in a move that would rapidly bring the conflict to an end, defence experts have said.

Thomas Harding, The Telegraph, March 23, 2011

There are growing doubts that the rebels will be able to prevail over Col Gaddafi’s forces without outside intervention, and there are worries too that a costly and dangerous stalemate will follow a lack of decisive military action.

Brig Ben Barry, of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, said however that if a provisional council was recognised by the United Nations, it would be able to accept arms, and could quickly overthrow Gaddafi loyalists or persuade the Libyan ruler’s inner circle to oust him.

Read full article here

Libya rebels coordinating with West on air assault

with one comment

…the United Nations Security Council resolution authorizing military action in Libya does not include airstrikes specifically to aid rebel forces.

David Zucchino and Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, March 24, 2011

Reporting from Benghazi, Libya, and Washington—
Leaders of the opposition national council in rebel-controlled eastern Libya say they are making regular, secure contacts with allied military representatives in Europe to help commanders identify targets for the U.S.-led air assault.

The contacts, conducted through the council’s civilian representatives in France and elsewhere in Europe, are made by secure satellite telephone connections, according to spokesmen for the rebel leadership in its eastern base of Benghazi.

“There is communication between the Provisional National Council and U.N. assembled forces, and we work on letting them know what areas need to be bombarded,” spokesman Ahmed Khalifa said in an interview Wednesday.
Read the rest of this entry »

Written by peripheralrevision

03/23/2011 at 9:53 pm

China escalates opposition to Libya airstrikes, joins Russia & India in calling for cease-fire

leave a comment »

ANDREW JACOBS, The New York Times, March 22, 2011

BEIJING — China escalated its opposition to American-led airstrikes on Libya on Tuesday, joining Russia and India in calls for an immediate cease-fire and suggesting that coalition forces were imperiling civilians by exceeding the United Nations-mandated no-fly zone.

The rising criticism among the so-called BRIC group — Brazil, Russia, India and China — came amid allegations by the Libyan government that allied bombings had killed or wounded scores of civilians, a claim rejected by American military officials.

On Monday, hours after the departure of President Obama, Brazil issued a statement condemning the attacks and urging “the start of dialogue.”

China’s response to the campaign has been the most forceful, warning that the assault could bring about a “humanitarian disaster.” In a news briefing Tuesday, Jiang Yu, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, called for an end to hostilities. “We’ve seen reports that the use of armed force is causing civilian casualties, and we oppose the wanton use of armed force leading to more civilian casualties,” she said.
Read the rest of this entry »

Bombardment with social expenditures: Libya intervention good for profits, bad for taxpayers

leave a comment »

The majority of Americans definitely do not cheer to the Libyan drums of war stripping the budget with every stroke, but some in US can actually benefit from a longstanding campaign.

The reported cost of a single Tomahawk missile launched into Libya is from 1 to 1.5 million dollars. It has only been a few days into operation Odyssey Dawn and already the cost of the bombardment from sea and air are skyrocketing. The price of day one alone was more than 100 million dollars.

“Within the first two hours they fired 110 cruise missiles, so right there thousands of teachers of course could be paid for,” said Sara Flounders, a co-founder of the International Action Center in New York.

Can the country afford getting involved again, coming at a time when teachers not to mention other public workers are fighting to keep their livelihoods, close to 10 per cent of people are unemployed, and the country faces 14 trillion dollars of national debt? The US has already committed trillions to ongoing wars in Afghanistan as well as Iraq. Yet despite all this, has moved to the helm of this international intervention.
Read the rest of this entry »

The Libyan war: Unconstitutional and illegitimate (and opposed by “every other major power on earth”)

leave a comment »

Michael Lind,, March 21, 2011

What do the five countries that registered their opposition to the Libyan war have in common? They make up most of the great powers of the early twenty-first century. A few years back, Goldman Sachs identified the so-called “BRIC’s” — Brazil, Russia, India and China — as the most important emerging countries in the world. The opponents of the Libyan war on the Security Council are the BRIC’s plus Germany, the most populous and richest country in Europe.

Including the United States, the Security Council nations that voted for the no-fly zone resolution have a combined population of a little more than 700 million people and a combined GDP, in terms of purchasing power parity, of roughly $20 trillion. The Security Council countries that showed their disapproval of the Libyan war by abstaining from the vote have a combined population of about 3 billion people and a GDP of around $21 trillion.

If the U.S. is factored out, the disproportion between the pro-war and anti-war camps on the Security Council is even more striking. The countries that abstained from the vote account for more than 40 percent of the human race. The countries that joined the U.S. in voting to authorize attacks on Libya, including Britain and France, have a combined population that adds up to a little more than 5 percent of the human race.

The truth is that the U.S. is joined in its war on Libya by only two second-rank great powers, Britain and France, which between them carved up North Africa and the Middle East a century ago, slaughtering and torturing many Arabs in the process. Every other major power on earth (with the exception of Japan, which is not on the Council and has been quiet) opposed the Anglo-French-American attack in North Africa, registering that opposition by abstentions rather than “no” votes in the Security Council.

Read the full article here

Written by peripheralrevision

03/22/2011 at 11:47 am

U.S. defense chief warns against expanding military strike goals in Libya

leave a comment »

+Its a sad state of affairs when Sec. Gates has become the closest voice to reason in the Obama administration after losing out to more hawkish voices, namely Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and others (who aren’t shy about piling ever more hot Middle East military mess on the DoD’s plate) over whether or not to engage militarily in Libya -PR+

Xinhua, march 20, 2011

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned on Sunday that it will complicate the consensus around the UN Security Council resolution on no-fly zone over Libya if there is an attempt to expand the goals of military strikes against the North African nation.

Speaking onboard a plane enroute to Russia, the Pentagon chief made his first public comment about the air mission against Libya, saying he thinks “it’s important that we operate within the mandate of the UN Security Council resolution.”

Gates said the mission is backed by a diverse coalition, and adding additional objectives to the mission “create a problem in that respect.” He also said “it’s unwise to set as specific goals things that you may or may not be able to achieve.”

Gates said most nations in the region want to see Libya remain a unified state, and “having states in the region begin to break up because of internal differences, I think, is a formula for real instability in the future.”
Read the rest of this entry »

Written by peripheralrevision

03/20/2011 at 8:49 pm